What is Insider Trading?

By
Joe Kafrouni
03 Feb 2019
5
min read

Insider trading is a financial crime. Although it does not receive quite as much attention as other financial crimes, such as fraud, it remains relatively pervasive. However, the classification of insider trading is quite complex, and below, there is a more extended description of its various components. Essentially, though, insider trading is the use of sensitive or privileged commercial information to mitigate risks and increase returns in the trade of financial products. It is often seen on financial markets, where privileged inside information can allow traders to unfairly manage the risks associated with their transactions.

Insider trading is a crime under the Corporations Act 2001

The most salient prohibition on insider trading is found in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). In Part 7.10, Division 3 of the Act, insider trading is defined, and made an offence. In Division 3, section 1043A prohibits certain conduct on the part of those in possession of inside information. The relevant elements and definitions of that offence are listed below.

Element 1: knowingly possessing inside information

This element lays the foundation of the offence of insider trading. Its first subset is the term ‘inside information.’ To amount to inside information, information must not be generally available. It must also be of the nature that if it were generally available, a reasonable person would expect it to have a material effect on the price or value of financial products. The second subset of element 1 is ‘knowingly possessing’ inside information. Specifically, under section 1043A(1)(b), a person must know that they are in possession of inside information. However, such knowledge needn’t be overt; it is sufficient that a person ought to have known the relevant information was inside in nature. Basically, if it is obvious enough to a reasonable person that certain information is inside information, liability cannot be avoided on the basis that actual knowledge was absent.

Element 2: communicating inside information

Element 2 is offered by section 1043A(2), and it is only relevant where an individual has communicated inside information to another. In such situations, the first individual will be liable for insider trading if the second individual engages in conduct of the nature described in element 3. For example, if A provides information to B, and B trades in financial products in reliance on that information, A’s conduct will amount to insider trading. In circumstances where insider information is not communicated, it is still possible to prove the offence of insider trading. Element 2 may be skipped entirely, if inside information is not communicated to another party in the relevant way.

Element 3: applying for, acquiring, or disposing of financial products

Element 3 is created by sections 1043A(1)(c)-(d) or (2)(c)-(d). Elements 1 and 2 were focused on establishing the nature of inside information, and the manner in which it is managed. Element 3, on the other hand, is concerned with the ‘trading’ aspect of insider trading. This element defines ‘trading’ as applying for, acquiring, or disposing of financial products. Financial products are defined as a facility through which – or through the acquisition of which – a person makes financial investments, manages financial risks, or makes non-cash payments. Facilities are then defined to include:

  1. Intangible property;
  2. An arrangement or term of an arrangement; or
  3. A combination of both.

Therefore, insider trading is the use of inside information to apply for, acquire, or dispose of the financial products defined above.

Insider trading is a serious criminal offence capable of attracting significant punishments

Evidently, insider trading under the Corporations Act is a complex crime. The legalistic terms used by the legislation to define insider trading also make it hard for ordinary businesses to recognise. Without a background in commercial law, piecing together the obligations and restrictions created by the Corporations Act is challenging. Consequently, it is important to seek legal advice when dealing with information that might qualify as inside information. That includes any information that’s not generally available and that may have a material effect on the price or value of financial products.

By Finian McGrath

Disclaimer

The information provided by Kafrouni Lawyers is intended to provide general information and is not legal advice or a substitute for it. Business people should always consult their own legal advisors to discuss their particular circumstances. Kafrouni Lawyers makes no warranties or representations regarding the information and exclude any liability which may arise as a result of the use of this information. This information is the copyright of Kafrouni Lawyers.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation.

What People Say

Joe's been our company’s lawyer from the beginning and has been instrumental in our journey as company owners and directors. When dealing with both complex and sensitive company issues, Joe is able to provide us with clearly articulated strategies that are well thought‐out and with the bigger picture in mind. He genuinely cares and is always willing to share his personal views, which are both honest and just. Joe is highly professional and knowledgeable in his field. You will definitely benefit having him on your team.
Joe has assisted us with numerous acquisitions and mergers over the last 10 years. Joe's advice and expertise have been invaluable. Joe is always prompt and professional and answers all of our questions in detail. I can highly recommend working with Kafrouni Law and we will look forward to working with them for many years to come.
Thank you, Joe. It was a pleasure working with you to resolve the matter today. In particular, I appreciated your patience to fully understand each party’s position and to bed down a final heads of agreement to conclude the resolution between the parties.
Kafrouni Lawyers assisted me to resolve my partnership and company shareholder dispute over a family cattle business and property. From the start, Joe provided practical advice and options to resolve the dispute away from the courts. His perseverance and technical skill helped unravel a complex financial structure, resolved disputed shareholder claims, and resulted in a signed settlement deed rather than litigation. Joe cared to explain the legal and financial complexities behind his step by step advice and maintained our focus on the end goal. Joe's involvement certainly improved my family's position and I recommend Joe to anyone finding themselves in similar circumstances.
The biggest lesson I have learnt from you recently, Joe, is that it pays to have a professional such as yourself on my side to deal with matters that I am unequipped to handle … so I can carry on with the task at hand of building my business! Thanks again, I’ll take pleasure in recommending your services to anyone in need.
Joe, I appreciate it was a very long day yesterday but we got there in the end. I thought you did a great job and I enjoyed watching your approach and the way you conducted the mediation.  
Joe, as you know we were in a very difficult position with our company before we engaged you as our lawyer and fortunately, even with the odds stacked heavily against us in our shareholders dispute, you managed to pull us through to victory. You are a true credit to the industry not only because of your skilled negotiating tactics but also due to your personable nature, which made us feel comfortable in such a volatile situation.
A big thank you for your time today, Joe. Thankfully we managed to strike a deal although it took a little while to do. Thanks for your patience and perseverance.

Consultation

For new clients, I offer a paid initial phone consultation for $1,430 (incl. GST), which covers up to two hours of my time.

This option provides a relatively low-risk way for us to discuss your situation and explore how I may be able to help. I will provide initial advice and direction where possible. However, most matters require more than two hours to complete; if that’s the case, I’ll provide a follow-up proposal outlining how I'm able to help and an estimate of legal fees.

I set aside only a limited number of consultation times. If you can’t find a suitable time, or would like to clarify anything before booking, please get in touch — I’ll do my best to accommodate you.

Skip to main content