GST (Supply of a Going Concern) and Business Sales: A Deeper Look

By
Joe Kafrouni
26 Jun 2014
•
5
min read

The Benefit

Whether a sale is a “supply of a going concern” and therefore GST free impacts on every business sale. If so, the buyer will be saved from funding an additional 10% of the sale price. Depending on the sale price, this may be substantial.

The Elements

For the sale to be a “supply of a going concern”, Subdivision 38-J (section 38-325) of A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 requires that:

  1. The supply is for consideration;
  2. The recipient is registered or required to be registered;
  3. The supplier and the recipient have agreed in writing that the supply is of a going concern;
  4. The supplier carries on, or will carry on, the enterprise until the day of the supply (whether or not as a part of a larger enterprise carried on by the supplier).
  5. The supplier supplies to the recipient all of the things that are necessary for the continued operation of an enterprise.

Let’s consider each of these elements when selling a business utilising the REIQ Business Sale Contract as an example.

The supply is for consideration:

“Consideration” is defined in section 9-15 and includes “any payment, or any act or forbearance, in connection with a supply of anything”. Under section 9-10, a supply is “any form of supply whatsoever”. Therefore, the sale of a business is a “supply”. Given most businesses sold require a payment, i.e. the sale price; the supply would be for consideration.

The recipient is registered or required to be registered:

The recipient (i.e. the buyer) is “registered” if they are registered for GST. The recipient can be registered if they are “carrying on” an enterprise (section 23-10). “Carrying on” an enterprise is defined to include doing anything in the course of commencement of the enterprise. Therefore, a newly established entity buying a business can be registered. Registration can be determined by doing an “ABN Lookup” which is a search through the business.gov.au website. A recipient is required to be registered if their GST turnover meets the registration turnover threshold (section 23-5). The threshold is set under section 23-15 and the regulations, and is currently $75,000. In most cases, the buyer’s ability to meet this clause is not difficult.

The supplier and the recipient have agreed in writing that the supply is of a going concern:

This is satisfied by the GST clause in the Contract (cl 3.3), which records that the parties contract on the basis that the supply is GST free and the price excludes GST.

The supplier carries on, or will carry on, the enterprise until the day of the supply:

Applying paragraphs 141 to 148 GSTR 2002/5, the “day of the supply” is the date of Completion under the Contract. Also, to carry on the business to that day, the business must be fully operational right up to that day by the seller. The only exception seems to be stated in paragraph 145 i.e. a temporarily ceasing some activities for cleaning and maintenance purposes.

The supplier supplies to the recipient all of the things that are necessary for the continued operation of an enterprise:

Whether or not a “supplier supplies to the recipient all of the things that are necessary for the continued operation of an enterprise” is the most difficult element to determine. Again, GSTR 2002/5 is helpful to determining whether this element is satisfied. It states:

A “thing” is necessary for the continued operation of an “identified enterprise” if the enterprise could not be operated by the recipient in the absence of that thing (paragraph 73).

Two elements are essential for the continued operation of an enterprise (paragraph 75):

  1. the assets necessary for the continued operation of the enterprise including, where appropriate, premises, plant and equipment, stock-in-trade and intangible assets such as goodwill, contracts, licences and quotas; and
  2. the operating structure and process of the enterprise consisting of the commercial or economic activity relevant to the type of enterprise being conducted, for example, ongoing advertising and promotion.

The intended and actual use by the recipient of all of the things supplied are not relevant in determining if there is a ‘supply of a going concern’. The enterprise may be continued as a different enterprise, as part of a larger enterprise, or may not be continued at all by the recipient (paragraph 81).

Certain things which are used in the enterprise as a matter of choice by the supplier conducting the enterprise are not necessary in circumstances where the enterprise could be carried on in the absence of those things, (that is, they are not essential). (paragraph 83).

Example of “things that are not necessary”(paragraphs 84 to 86):

  • Bill is the proprietor of a medium sized insurance broking firm. He operates his business entirely from an inner city office building and all appointments with clients are conducted at these premises. He does not require a motor vehicle for business purposes.
  • Bill enters into an agreement to sell his business to Jake. Under the arrangement, Bill supplies his client list, goodwill, office furniture and equipment, and assigns the lease over the premises.
  • As a motor vehicle is not one of the things that is essential for the continued operation of Bill’s enterprise, it is not necessary for Bill to supply a motor vehicle to Jake as part of the arrangement. That is, it is not one of the things that must necessarily be supplied under the arrangement in order for the sale of Bill’s insurance broking firm to qualify as a ‘supply of a going concern’.

Example of “things that are necessary” (paragraphs 87 to 89):

  • Ben conducts a mobile mechanic business. He has a specially fitted out van which carries all his tools and equipment. Ben travels widely throughout the metropolitan area and carries out repairs at clients’ premises. He does not have a workshop of his own where repairs can be performed.
  • Ben enters into an agreement with Pistons Pty Ltd (‘Pistons’), a company that owns several motor repair workshops, to sell his business. Under the arrangement between Ben and Pistons, Ben supplies his client list, the mobile telephone number, goodwill and motor vehicle, together with all the equipment and tools.
  • Ben’s motor vehicle is essential to the continued operation of his enterprise and is one of the things that must necessarily be supplied under the arrangement for the sale of his business to qualify as a ‘supply of a going concern’.

Conclusion

Parties to a business sale contract should seek advice from their tax advisor / accountant prior to entering into a business sale contract to determine the impact of GST on the transaction. Extra precaution should be taken in circumstances where the seller seeks to exclude items from the business sale.

Want my view on your own situation?

Book an initial consultation

: up to two hours with me by phone for a fixed fee of $1,650 (including GST), then a short written note of my advice and next steps. If my conflict check means I can't act, I'll refund your fee in full. To check anything first, email

info@klaw.com.au

or call

(07) 3103 3199

.

Joe Kafrouni, Accredited Specialist in Business Law, Kafrouni Law

Disclaimer: This article is general information only and is not legal advice. Before acting on it, get advice on your own circumstances. To the extent the law allows, Kafrouni Law accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on it. This article is the copyright of Kafrouni Law.

What People Say

Joe's been our company’s lawyer from the beginning and has been instrumental in our journey as company owners and directors. When dealing with both complex and sensitive company issues, Joe is able to provide us with clearly articulated strategies that are well thought‐out and with the bigger picture in mind. He genuinely cares and is always willing to share his personal views, which are both honest and just. Joe is highly professional and knowledgeable in his field. You will definitely benefit having him on your team.

Company director and shareholder

Joe has assisted us with numerous acquisitions and mergers over the last 10 years. Joe's advice and expertise have been invaluable. Joe is always prompt and professional and answers all of our questions in detail. I can highly recommend working with Kafrouni Law and we will look forward to working with them for many years to come.

Managing director, acquisitions

Thank you, Joe. It was a pleasure working with you to resolve the matter today. In particular, I appreciated your patience to fully understand each party’s position and to bed down a final heads of agreement to conclude the resolution between the parties.

Business owner, commercial dispute

Kafrouni Lawyers assisted me to resolve my partnership and company shareholder dispute over a family cattle business and property. From the start, Joe provided practical advice and options to resolve the dispute away from the courts. His perseverance and technical skill helped unravel a complex financial structure, resolved disputed shareholder claims, and resulted in a signed settlement deed rather than litigation. Joe cared to explain the legal and financial complexities behind his step by step advice and maintained our focus on the end goal. Joe's involvement certainly improved my family's position and I recommend Joe to anyone finding themselves in similar circumstances.

Partner and shareholder, family agricultural business

The biggest lesson I have learnt from you recently, Joe, is that it pays to have a professional such as yourself on my side to deal with matters that I am unequipped to handle … so I can carry on with the task at hand of building my business! Thanks again, I’ll take pleasure in recommending your services to anyone in need.

Business owner

Joe, as you know we were in a very difficult position with our company before we engaged you as our lawyer and fortunately, even with the odds stacked heavily against us in our shareholders dispute, you managed to pull us through to victory. You are a true credit to the industry not only because of your skilled negotiating tactics but also due to your personable nature, which made us feel comfortable in such a volatile situation.

Company director, shareholder dispute

‍
‍

Book an initial consultation

An initial consultation is the best way for us to find out whether, and how, I can help. It suits business owners and directors facing a decision that matters. You get my considered view of your situation, not just a first impression.

‍

The fee is a fixed $1,650 (including GST). It covers a phone consultation of up to two hours, plus up to one hour of my time to consider the material you send me beforehand and to prepare my written note afterwards. Here is how it works:

1. When you book, you tell me briefly what the matter is about and who else is involved, so I can carry out a conflict check and confirm I’m free to act. If I can’t act for you, I’ll refund your fee in full.

2. I tell you what information and documents I’d like to see, and I consider them before we speak.

3. We talk it through by phone. I give you my initial advice, the options I see and what I’d do in your shoes.

4. Afterwards, I send you a short written note of my advice and the next steps I recommend.

‍

If I can help further, I’ll explain how. If I can’t, I’ll say so. You are under no obligation to engage me further. If your matter needs more than this, I’ll send you a proposal setting out how I can help and an estimate of my fees. No further work starts until you accept it.

‍

I keep only a limited number of consultation times. If none suits you, or you’d like to check anything before booking, email info@klaw.com.au and I’ll do my best to accommodate you.

Skip to main content